c# zonal ocr

c# tesseract ocr pdf example

c# ocr library open source

c# free ocr api

tesseract 3 ocr c# example

c# tesseract ocr pdf example,
ocr sdk for c#.net,
ocr api c#,
c# ocr pdf free,
best ocr api for c#,
c# winforms ocr,
c# free ocr api,
c# ocr pdf open source,
tesseract ocr pdf to text c#,
convert image to text ocr free c#,
c# tesseract ocr tiff,
c# ocr library free,
tesseract ocr c# image to text,
c# google ocr example,
onenote ocr in c#,
tesseract ocr c# image to text,
emgu ocr c# example,
best c# ocr library,
c# ocr example,
how to use tesseract ocr with c#,
c# aspose ocr example,
c# ocr library,
onenote ocr c# example,
read text from image c# without ocr,
ocr in c#,
c# tesseract ocr example,
c# read ocr pdf,
best ocr library c#,
abbyy ocr sdk c#,

You could add characters directly to the char_frequency table, and because the table has a char(2) column, you could add two-character sequences as well. But because the bitmask is at best a bigint value, you cannot have more than 63 different weights. Mainly to see the effect, I filled char_frequency with all the two-letter sequences in the data (save those with the at (@) and period (.) characters ). In total, there are 561. I then wrote the procedure build_big_bitmask_sp, which generates a version of char_bitmask that returns a binary(80) column. Finally, I wrote the procedure bit_search_three which uses this big bitmask. Strangely enough, the & operator does not support binary types, so I had to chop up the big bitmask into 10 bigint values using substring, resulting in unwieldy code. On my machine it took 1 hour to create the index on SQL 2005, and on SQL 2008 it was even worse: 90 minutes. The total size of the index is 114 MB, a little more than the fragments_personlists table. The good news is that bit_search_three performs better for the string aam although it s slower for the full email address:

Telepresence is a refined, advanced form of robot remote control The robot operator gets a sense of being on location, even if the remotely controlled machine, or telechir, and the operator are miles apart Control and feedback are done by means of telemetry sent over wires, optical fibers, or radio

represented by myCounter, and set myNewFileInfo to the info property for myNewFile Then set myMessage to its existing contents, the name property of myNewFileInfo, and a return, so as to build a list of the files dropped on the droplet The added statements appear in boldface here:

Disk Cache joy 156 0 aam 516 93 niska 13693 2290 omamo@ 1793 813

But the result from the volume test is certainly discouraging:

on adding folder items to myFolder after receiving added_items tell application "Finder" to set fName to name of myFolder try set myMessage to "" repeat with myCounter from 1 to number of items in added_items set myNewFile to item myCounter of added_items set myNewFileInfo to the info for myNewFile set myMessage to myMessage & name of myNewFileInfo & return end repeat end try end adding folder items to

.

-- Possible Bad Indexes (writes > reads) SELECT object_name(s.object_id) AS 'Table Name', i.name AS 'Index Name', i.index_id, user_updates AS 'Total Writes', user_seeks + user_scans + user_lookups AS 'Total Reads', user_updates - (user_seeks + user_scans + user_lookups) AS 'Difference' FROM sys.dm_db_index_usage_stats AS s INNER JOIN sys.indexes AS i ON s.object_id = i.object_id AND i.index_id = s.index_id WHERE objectproperty(s.object_id,'IsUserTable') = 1 AND s.database_id = db_id() -- Filter for current database AND user_updates > (user_seeks + user_scans + user_lookups ) ORDER BY 'Difference' DESC, 'Total Writes' DESC, 'Total Reads' ASC;

Indexes that have many more writes than reads are possible candidates for elimination. You should be aware that user scans are much more expensive than user seeks or user lookups. If you see lots of user scans, you may be missing some important indexes or you could be doing lots of aggregate queries or have small tables.

the list of files dropped on the droplet), together with an explanatory title bar and a solitary OK button The new statement appears in boldface here: